![read gay porn comics read gay porn comics](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f3/f4/3d/f3f43d557ba7c42eadaab7effa767725.jpg)
Stewart tried to distinguish the three other rulings from Roe, saying they were clearer, had given rise to more public reliance and did not “involve the purposeful termination of a human life.” “I just think you’re dissimilating when you say that any ruling here wouldn’t have an effect on those.” “I’m not trying to argue that we should overturn those cases,” she said of the other decisions. The same could be said, using the draft opinion’s general reasoning, for contraception, gay intimacy and same-sex marriage, rights established by three Supreme Court decisions that were discussed at some length in the argument in December.Īt the argument, Sotomayor sparred with Scott Stewart, Mississippi’s solicitor general, who was defending a state law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. It said a right to abortion cannot be found in the Constitution or inferred from its provisions. On the other hand, the logic of the opinion left plenty of room for debate. “Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” “To ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right,” he wrote. On the one hand, he asserted, in a sort of disclaimer that struck a defensive tone, that other rights would remain secure. The opinion, by Justice Samuel Alito, provided conflicting signals about its sweep and consequences.
![read gay porn comics read gay porn comics](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/bb/a5/99/bba599ba1da1064569a509fdcf48cf16.jpg)
Digital Replica Edition Home Page Close Menu